Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: A3
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This is a partial-order (above/below) problem; we must deduce the lowest element consistent with all “above/under” relations.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
From the chain A1 > A2 > A3 (where “>” = “above”), A3 is below both A1 and A2. Also A4 is above A3, and A5 is above A1. No statement puts anyone below A3.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Combine: A5 > A1 > A2 > A3 and A4 > A3.Thus every named person (A1, A2, A4, A5) is above A3, while no one is stated to be under A3.Therefore A3 must be the bottommost.
Verification / Alternative check:
Any attempt to place another boy below A3 contradicts at least one “under/above” relation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Each of A1/A2/A4/A5 is explicitly above someone else and hence cannot be the lowest.
Final Answer:
A3
Discussion & Comments