Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: (ii) (iii)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The implication is RRHComes ⇒ WolfNotFarBehind. We need a pair reflecting that co-occurrence.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Select (ii) with (iii), aligning antecedent and consequent.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
(ii) (i) is weaker and uses a different predicate ("behind" vs "not far behind").
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They either contradict or fail to capture the stated consequence.
Common Pitfalls:
Overlooking the "not far" qualifier.
Final Answer:
(ii) (iii)
Discussion & Comments