Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: (ii) (iii)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The implication is RRHComes ⇒ WolfNotFarBehind. We need a pair reflecting that co-occurrence.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Select (ii) with (iii), aligning antecedent and consequent.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assume (ii) true.Then (iii) must be true.Verification / Alternative check:(ii) (i) is weaker and uses a different predicate ("behind" vs "not far behind").
Why Other Options Are Wrong:They either contradict or fail to capture the stated consequence.
Common Pitfalls:Overlooking the "not far" qualifier.
Final Answer:(ii) (iii)
Discussion & Comments