Routh–Hurwitz stability test in control engineering Which of the following statements correctly describes a limitation or capability of the Routh–Hurwitz criterion applied to a linear time-invariant system?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: It cannot be applied directly when a pure transportation lag is present (e.g., e^(−Ls)) unless the lag is approximated.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The Routh–Hurwitz criterion is a classical analytical tool used to assess closed-loop stability of linear time-invariant (LTI) systems. Instead of computing all roots of the characteristic polynomial, it uses a tabular test (the Routh array) to determine whether any roots lie in the right-half complex plane. This question checks your understanding of what Routh–Hurwitz can and cannot do, especially when time delays appear in the loop.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • System is LTI and described by a characteristic equation in s.
  • “Transportation lag” refers to a pure time delay with factor e^(−L s).
  • Stability is defined by the location of characteristic roots (poles) in the s-plane.


Concept / Approach:
Routh–Hurwitz applies to characteristic equations that are polynomials in s. It reveals how many roots are in the right half-plane (RHP), on the imaginary axis, or in the left half-plane (LHP) by testing the signs/patterns in the first column of the Routh array. However, it does not return the actual root coordinates; it is a counting test, not a root-solver. When a pure time delay e^(−L s) is present, the characteristic equation is not a polynomial. To use Routh, one must first approximate the delay (for example, with a Pade approximation), thereby recovering a rational approximation suitable for the Routh test.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify what Routh–Hurwitz can do: count RHP roots from a polynomial.Identify what it cannot do: provide exact pole locations.Recognize why pure delay is problematic: e^(−L s) is non-polynomial → needs approximation.Select the statement that captures this limitation regarding time delay.


Verification / Alternative check:
Standard control texts advise approximating delays before applying Routh or using frequency-domain methods (Nyquist) that handle delays more naturally.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Provides exact locations: False; Routh only counts, it does not locate.
  • Not applicable to polynomials: False; it is specifically for polynomials.
  • Counts RHP roots: True statement in (a), but the question asks for the best single descriptor including the delay limitation; option (b) most directly answers the prompt about transportation lag.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing Routh’s counting ability with root-solving; overlooking the special handling required for time delays.


Final Answer:
It cannot be applied directly when a pure transportation lag is present (e.g., e^(−Ls)) unless the lag is approximated.

More Questions from Process Control and Instrumentation

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion