On a feasibility study committee for a proposed information system, what roles do department representatives typically play?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Both (a) and (b)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Feasibility committees evaluate whether a proposed system should advance. Department representatives are critical because they understand local processes, constraints, and user needs. Under the Recovery-First Policy, ambiguous original choices are repaired to accurately reflect common practice: representatives serve as information sources and as liaisons back to their departments.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The committee needs accurate domain knowledge and stakeholder alignment.
  • Representatives communicate requirements, constraints, and acceptance considerations.
  • They relay committee findings back to their teams to ensure buy-in.


Concept / Approach:
The representative’s dual role is to provide timely, reliable information (process maps, exception cases, data definitions) and to act as a communication bridge, translating project decisions and gathering feedback. They may or may not be the ultimate direct users, depending on the system’s scope.



Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify key committee needs: facts, constraints, user perspectives.2) Map roles: subject-matter information source and liaison.3) Evaluate options: (a) and (b) together capture the typical responsibilities.4) Conclude that “Both (a) and (b)” is the best answer.



Verification / Alternative check:
Project governance frameworks often define RACI-like roles; department reps commonly have “consulted” and “informed” responsibilities, consistent with being sources and liaisons.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Ready source of information: true but incomplete alone.Liaison to their departments: true but incomplete alone.Direct users of the new system: may be true in some cases but not inherent to the representative role.None of the above: incorrect since the combined role is standard.



Common Pitfalls:
Assuming representatives speak for all users without validation; failing to feed updates back to departments, which undermines change management.


Final Answer:
Both (a) and (b)

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion