Statement–Argument — Should higher education be restricted to only those who can bear the cost? Arguments: I) Yes; higher education is expensive and should not be free. II) No; many brilliant students cannot afford fees and should still access higher education. Choose the strong argument(s).

Introduction / Context:
Access to higher education affects human capital and mobility. A strong argument should address equity and talent utilization.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Cost barriers can exclude capable students.
• Societies use scholarships, loans, and subsidies to preserve access.
• “Expensive ⇒ exclude” is not a compelling policy principle.

Concept / Approach:
Argument II is strong: it directly links affordability to preserving merit and national talent. Argument I is weak: cost alone does not justify exclusion; policy can share costs without denying access.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Financial-aid systems exist precisely for II’s rationale.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Either/Neither” misread the clear policy relevance of II.

Common Pitfalls:
Treating cost recovery as the sole objective of universities.

Final Answer:
if only argument II is strong.