According to the passage describing Namita's employment with the Nairs in Dubai and Gopal's work with a contractor, Namita's situation is considered better than that of Gopal mainly for which of the following reasons?

Introduction / Context:
This question continues from the same passage about Namita and Gopal working abroad. Namita works as a governess in Dubai, while Gopal works for a construction contractor in the Emirates. The passage highlights differences in their circumstances. The question asks why Namita's situation is described as better compared to Gopal's, which tests your ability to compare and contrast characters using the details given.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Namita is employed by the Nair family, who are described as nice and gentle.
• She has no cause to complain about their behaviour, at least in the beginning.
• Gopal, on the other hand, has his passport confiscated and lives in crowded, uncomfortable conditions.
• It is implied that Gopal is being exploited, whereas Namita is treated fairly well in terms of daily life.

Concept / Approach:
Reading comprehension comparison questions require careful attention to the details used by the author to portray each character's situation. Namita is anxious about the illegal nature of her employer's work, but her personal treatment is decent. Gopal faces both economic hardship and direct exploitation by the contractor. The better situation for Namita is linked primarily to how she is treated by the family she works for.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Revisit Namita's part of the passage: the Nairs are nice and gentle, and at first she has no cause to complain.Step 2: Revisit Gopal's part: his family sells land, his passport is taken away, and he is forced to live in a small place with many others, which shows a high level of exploitation.Step 3: Identify the main contrast: Namita has a humane and polite employer, while Gopal is under a harsh contractor.Step 4: Review the options to see which one exactly captures this key difference.Step 5: Recognise that "has a well behaved employer" is the most accurate summary of why her position, although risky, is still better than Gopal's.

Verification / Alternative check:
Ask yourself, if Namita and Gopal exchanged employers, whose daily life would likely be worse? Clearly, living under Gopal's contractor would be more difficult, so Namita's current employer, being gentle and considerate, gives her a comparatively better situation. The passage stresses that she has no cause to complain about personal treatment, which supports option A over the others.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B, "knows what she wants to do", is not emphasised. She may want to go home, but that is not the reason her situation is better. Option C, "loves the new place and the child", is not explicitly stated; the passage focuses more on treatment by the employer rather than emotional attachment to the place. Option D, "now knows about her employer", actually increases her worry rather than improving her situation. The central positive difference is that her employers behave decently towards her in everyday life.

Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes over focus on the illegal business aspect and think that Namita's situation becomes worse than Gopal's. However, the question is about why her situation is still better overall. Another pitfall is choosing an option that is partially true but not the main reason. Always focus on what the passage clearly states or strongly implies as the main contrast between two characters.

Final Answer:
The correct answer is has a well behaved employer, because Namita is treated kindly and respectfully by the Nair family, whereas Gopal faces direct exploitation and poor living conditions under his contractor, making her situation comparatively better.