Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: needs revision of section
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Shear design in RCC beams requires checking the nominal shear stress against permissible limits. If the nominal shear exceeds the maximum allowable shear capacity of concrete (even with shear reinforcement), the section must be revised (e.g., increased depth or width) for safety.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
For a simply supported beam under UDL, the maximum shear force occurs at the supports and equals V = wL/2. The nominal shear stress is approximated as τ_v = V / (b * j·d) when the effective lever arm j·d is given. Compare τ_v with the allowable value. If τ_v far exceeds code limits (and likely the maximum permissible with reinforcement), the section must be revised.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Compute support shear: V = wL/2 = 12,000*6/2 = 36,000 kg.Nominal shear stress: τ_v = V / (b * j·d) = 36,000 / (30 * 55) = 36,000 / 1,650 = 21.82 kg/cm² (approx.).Compare with allowable: 21.82 kg/cm² » 5 kg/cm² → greatly exceeds limit.Conclusion: Even with shear reinforcement, such a high nominal shear typically surpasses maximum permissible limits; revise section.
Verification / Alternative check:
In classic working stress design tables, maximum shear stresses that concrete can sustain (even with stirrups) are much lower than ~22 kg/cm². Increasing depth (thus j·d and b·j·d) significantly reduces τ_v, offering a viable revision path.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Using d instead of j·d; forgetting to convert t/m to kg/m; checking shear at midspan instead of at supports; assuming stirrups can compensate unlimitedly for undersized sections.
Final Answer:
needs revision of section
Discussion & Comments