Analogy (role to characteristic trait): PROFESSOR is to ERUDITE as which pair matches this relationship?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: inventor : imaginative

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
This analogy checks whether you can link a role or archetype with a fitting trait commonly associated with it. While not every professor is erudite, the association is prototypical: professors are expected to be learned. We need a similar archetype-to-apt-trait pairing.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Base: professor → erudite (role → characteristic attribute).
  • Correct option: role → trait that plausibly and positively typifies that role.
  • Eliminate pairs that are unrelated, negative/incompatible, or merely licensing/status facts rather than traits.


Concept / Approach:
“Inventor : imaginative” fits: creativity is an expected trait of inventors. Licensure (“aviator : licensed”) is a credential, not a personality/ability trait. Other options either mismatch or express negative/irrelevant characteristics.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Check semantic type: trait vs. credential/status.Select “inventor : imaginative” — aligns as role → apt trait.Discard “procrastinator : conscientious” — contradictory; “overseer : wealthy” — not intrinsic; “moderator : vicious” — opposite of expected temperament.


Verification / Alternative check:

professor:erudite :: inventor:imaginative — both second terms describe valued intellectual qualities associated with the role.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

They denote licenses, socioeconomic status, or clashing traits, not a core positive attribute of the role.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing credentials or external conditions with inherent/valued personal traits.


Final Answer:
inventor : imaginative

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion