Introduction / Context:
The original pair expresses a legal cause-and-effect: a conviction (guilty finding) commonly leads to incarceration (imprisonment). We must choose another pair that preserves the same procedural progression within the justice system.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Base: conviction → incarceration (finding of guilt → confinement).
- Correct: earlier legal stage/event → its typical immediate consequence.
- Incorrect choices will invert stages, jump unrelated steps, or pair concepts that are not sequentially linked.
Concept / Approach:
After a verdict (particularly a guilty verdict), the next major step is sentencing. This mirrors conviction leading to incarceration. Other options either contradict the flow (accusation followed by acquittal is not a standard direct step) or mix non-sequential/legally mismatched events.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify legal sequence: charge → trial → verdict/conviction → sentencing → incarceration (in custodial cases).Match option “verdict : sentencing” — directly sequential; mirrors the base relationship.Eliminate “accusation : acquittal” — accusation does not directly result in acquittal; many steps intervene.Eliminate “appeal : indictment” — reversed/grab-bag of disparate stages.Eliminate “parole : arraignment” — parole occurs late; arraignment early; not causal.Eliminate “citation : testimony” — not a standard cause-effect pair.
Verification / Alternative check:
Both “conviction → incarceration” and “verdict → sentencing” articulate standard forward-moving steps in criminal procedure.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They either oppose the timeline, are not immediate consequents, or mix civil/criminal concepts incoherently.
Common Pitfalls:
Choosing legally themed words without checking procedural order and causality.
Final Answer:
verdict : sentencing
Discussion & Comments