Pressure transducers and resistance behavior: evaluate the statement—“A pressure transducer is a device whose resistance changes inversely in proportion to applied pressure.” Choose the most accurate assessment.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Pressure transducers convert pressure into an electrical signal. Many common industrial sensors use strain-gauge Wheatstone bridges, capacitive diaphragms, piezoresistive elements, or piezoelectric crystals. The question tests understanding of whether “inverse proportional resistance change” is a general defining behavior of pressure transducers.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Typical pressure transducer types: strain-gauge (piezoresistive), capacitive, piezoelectric.
  • “Inversely proportional” means R ∝ 1/P strictly.
  • We assess generality across technologies rather than a single special case.


Concept / Approach:
In a strain-gauge pressure sensor, pressure deflects a diaphragm, producing tensile or compressive strain in gauges. The gauge resistance follows R = R0 * (1 + GF * ε), with ε proportional to strain, which in turn depends on pressure via the diaphragm mechanics. This is not universally “inverse”; the sign and linearity depend on gauge orientation and mechanical design. Capacitive sensors vary capacitance C with diaphragm spacing; the readout circuitry typically converts C changes to voltage, not relying on an inverse resistance law. Piezoelectric sensors generate charge proportional to dynamic pressure changes, again not an inverse resistance relation.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Identify that “inverse proportional resistance” is an absolute claim.2) Compare with strain-gauge behavior: resistance changes with strain sign and magnitude, not universally as 1/P.3) Recognize other pressure technologies (capacitive, piezoelectric) do not rely on resistance inversion at all.4) Conclude the blanket statement is incorrect.


Verification / Alternative check:
Examine datasheets: bridge output is specified in mV/V full-scale per pressure, not as R inversely proportional to P. Calibration curves show near-linear bridge output with pressure over range, not a 1/P law.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct only for piezoelectric” and “Correct only for capacitive” are inaccurate because those technologies do not encode pressure as inverse resistance. “Correct for all strain-gauge bridges” is false; gauge orientation can increase or decrease R with applied pressure and does not yield a strict 1/P relationship.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming all sensors change resistance in the same simple way; conflating inverse proportionality with “opposite direction.”


Final Answer:
Incorrect

More Questions from Measurement, Conversion and Control

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion