Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Pressure transducers convert pressure into an electrical signal. Many common industrial sensors use strain-gauge Wheatstone bridges, capacitive diaphragms, piezoresistive elements, or piezoelectric crystals. The question tests understanding of whether “inverse proportional resistance change” is a general defining behavior of pressure transducers.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In a strain-gauge pressure sensor, pressure deflects a diaphragm, producing tensile or compressive strain in gauges. The gauge resistance follows R = R0 * (1 + GF * ε), with ε proportional to strain, which in turn depends on pressure via the diaphragm mechanics. This is not universally “inverse”; the sign and linearity depend on gauge orientation and mechanical design. Capacitive sensors vary capacitance C with diaphragm spacing; the readout circuitry typically converts C changes to voltage, not relying on an inverse resistance law. Piezoelectric sensors generate charge proportional to dynamic pressure changes, again not an inverse resistance relation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Examine datasheets: bridge output is specified in mV/V full-scale per pressure, not as R inversely proportional to P. Calibration curves show near-linear bridge output with pressure over range, not a 1/P law.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Correct only for piezoelectric” and “Correct only for capacitive” are inaccurate because those technologies do not encode pressure as inverse resistance. “Correct for all strain-gauge bridges” is false; gauge orientation can increase or decrease R with applied pressure and does not yield a strict 1/P relationship.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming all sensors change resistance in the same simple way; conflating inverse proportionality with “opposite direction.”
Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments