Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Separation of powers
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Political systems around the world are often classified as parliamentary or presidential depending on how executive and legislative powers are organised. The United States is a classic example of a presidential system. Understanding which key principle lies at the heart of the presidential form of government helps learners compare it with the parliamentary form used in India and many other countries. This question focuses on the fundamental constitutional principle that defines the structure of a presidential government.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In a presidential system, executive, legislative, and judicial powers are separated and vested in different organs. The President is both the head of state and head of government and is not directly responsible to the legislature in the same way as in a parliamentary system. This structure is based on the doctrine of separation of powers. Although there is also a system of checks and balances, the foundational idea is that executive and legislative functions are institutionally separate. Collective responsibility of the cabinet is more typical of parliamentary systems, where the cabinet is collectively responsible to the lower house.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that in a presidential system like that of the United States, the President and the legislature are elected separately.Step 2: Note that the President cannot be removed by the legislature through a simple vote of no confidence, which shows institutional separation.Step 3: Understand that this organisational pattern flows from the doctrine of separation of powers, where each organ has its own domain.Step 4: Compare this with the doctrine of collective responsibility, which belongs to parliamentary systems where the cabinet is responsible to the legislature.Step 5: Conclude that separation of powers is the key principle for a presidential government.
Verification / Alternative check:
An alternative check is to recall common textbook descriptions: presidential system equals separation of powers plus fixed term of office, while parliamentary system equals fusion of powers plus collective responsibility. Division of powers between centre and states refers to federalism and can exist in both types of systems. Centralisation of powers is more related to unitary structures. Balance of powers is an outcome of checks and balances, but the technical term highlighted in theory is separation of powers, which neatly matches this question.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Division of powers between centre and states describes federalism and is not unique to presidential systems. Centralisation of powers contradicts the idea of separate branches and would not be a defining principle here. Balance of powers is a general phrase and is implemented by the more precise idea of checks and balances, which relies on separated branches. Collective responsibility of the cabinet is a core feature of the parliamentary form, where the executive is drawn from and answerable to the legislature.
Common Pitfalls:
Students sometimes mix up the meanings of separation of powers and division of powers, thinking they refer to the same idea. It helps to remember that separation of powers is vertical between organs of government at one level, while division of powers is horizontal between different levels such as centre and states. Another mistake is to pick collective responsibility just because it sounds important. Recognising that this term belongs to parliamentary systems avoids that error.
Final Answer:
Separation of powers
Discussion & Comments