Statement–Assumption — A newly appointed Prime Minister says: “If you ask me about the daunting challenges we face, my government’s first priority is to improve the existing law-and-order situation. Next comes the issue of commodity prices.” Assumptions: I. If citizens can sleep peacefully (law and order), they can then focus on feeding their families, education, and moving freely. II. Prices of essential commodities significantly affect the common person.

Introduction / Context:
The speaker sequences priorities: stabilizing law and order before tackling price-level concerns. We must uncover the hidden premises that make this ordering rational and persuasive.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Primary priority cited: improve law and order.
• Secondary priority: address commodity prices.
• Audience: citizens who care about safety and affordability.

Concept / Approach:
In Statement–Assumption items, an assumption is a necessary belief that must hold for the statement to make sense. The PM’s ordering presupposes (I) security is foundational: without physical safety and social order, other life projects (earning, feeding families, education, mobility) are impaired. The ordering also presupposes (II) prices materially affect the public; otherwise ranking “prices” second would be arbitrary and politically tone-deaf.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Test I: If safety were not considered prerequisite, putting law and order first would be hard to justify. Hence I is necessary.2) Test II: If prices did not heavily impact citizens, elevating them to second priority would lack rationale. Hence II is necessary.

Verification / Alternative check:
Public-policy frameworks often treat “security” as a basic need and “affordability/inflation” as the next-order macro concern. The ordering mirrors Maslow-like tiers in governance.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Only I” neglects the salience of prices; “Only II” ignores security’s primacy; “Either” is insufficient; “Neither” conflicts with the explicit prioritization.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing political rhetoric with mere opinion; here, explicit ordering signals value and dependency assumptions.

Final Answer:
if both I and II is implicit.