Aircraft performance relationships: which of the following statements are correct regarding landing speed and take-off distance when expressed in terms of wing loading and power loading?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Both (a) and (b)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Basic aircraft sizing uses wing loading (W/S) and power loading (W/P) to frame performance. Landing speed scales with the square root of wing loading for a given maximum lift coefficient, while take-off distance lengthens as available power per unit weight decreases (i.e., as W/P increases).


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Wing loading W/S and power loading W/P are the key parameters.
  • CL_max and atmospheric conditions held comparable between cases.


Concept / Approach:
For landing approach, V_land ∝ sqrt(W/(S * CL_max)), so higher W/S implies a higher required speed (statement a). For take-off, distance S_TO ∝ f(W/P, W/S, CL, drag); holding W/S constant, S_TO grows as W/P increases (less power per unit weight), making statement (b) directionally correct.


Step-by-Step Solution:
Relate landing speed to wing loading through lift equilibrium at CL_max.Recognize that increased wing loading raises stall/landing speed.For take-off, fix W/S; lower specific power (higher W/P) lengthens ground run → distance increases with W/P.Therefore, both statements are valid.


Verification / Alternative check:
Preliminary design charts show families of constant W/S and W/P curves; performance trends align with the above relations across typical general-aviation and transport-class aircraft.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • (c) and other single-choice options ignore one of the true relationships.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Confusing “directly proportional” with “directionally increasing”; the exact proportionality involves square roots and additional coefficients.


Final Answer:
Both (a) and (b).

More Questions from Airport Engineering

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion