Analogy — “Umpire : Game”. Choose the pair that mirrors a person who officially oversees/controls a formal proceeding or event.

Introduction / Context:
An analogy tests whether two pairs share the same underlying relationship. In the stem, “Umpire : Game,” an umpire is the official who oversees and controls the conduct of a game by applying rules impartially. We must select a second pair that preserves this role-based oversight relationship in a different domain.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• An umpire is an official arbiter for games or sports.
• The second term should be the event or proceeding that is supervised.
• Exactly one option should express “official overseer : event.”

Concept / Approach:
We look for a role whose function is to preside over an event, enforce norms/protocols, manage turns, and keep order—parallel to an umpire in sport. A “moderator” fills this function in formal discussions, panels, or debates, ensuring orderly discourse and adherence to rules (time limits, speaking order, civility).

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Compare the responsibilities: umpire enforces rules on players; moderator enforces format/rules on speakers. Both are neutral arbiters concerned with procedure rather than content outcomes, satisfying the analogy tightly.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing producer/performer roles with supervisory/arbiter roles, or reversing the direction of the relationship.

Final Answer:
Moderator : Debate