System integrity and data quality: Which of the following is NOT typically listed among the three core dimensions of system/data integrity?

Introduction / Context:
Integrity describes the trustworthiness of data and systems. Core dimensions ensure that information is correct, whole, and protected from unauthorized change. This question asks you to identify the attribute that does not belong to the classic triad used in many governance frameworks.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Common integrity dimensions include accuracy, completeness, and protection from tampering.
• Security is often grouped with integrity to ensure safeguarding.
• “Appropriateness” is more a relevance/fitness concept than a strict integrity dimension.

Concept / Approach:
Integrity focuses on whether the data is correct and unaltered. Accuracy means numbers and facts are correct. Completeness means required data is present. Security (confidentiality, integrity, availability) provides controls that prevent unauthorized access or modification, thereby protecting integrity. Appropriateness relates to relevance for a given decision context and is typically discussed under information quality or usefulness, not integrity.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Data governance handbooks separate quality dimensions (accuracy, completeness, timeliness) and security from usefulness measures like relevance/appropriateness.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Accuracy: Core integrity/quality dimension.
• Completeness: Core integrity/quality dimension.
• Security: Protects integrity by controlling access and change.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing decision relevance (appropriateness) with data correctness and protection; mixing quality and governance categories.

Final Answer:
appropriateness