Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Noise immunity is a foundational specification in digital logic families (TTL, CMOS, ECL). A correct understanding is crucial for robust designs operating in real environments with crosstalk, supply ripple, and electromagnetic interference.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:The correct definition emphasizes resistance to noise-induced misinterpretation at the input. A logic family with good noise immunity ensures that small disturbances do not flip the interpreted logic level. The statement in question incorrectly describes the effect on the output as “causing spurious charges,” which reverses the idea: immunity prevents spurious changes, it does not cause them.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Clarify definition: Noise immunity = tolerance to noise without unintended output switching.Relate to thresholds: Adequate difference between VIH(min) and VIL(max) improves noise margin.Evaluate the statement: It claims spurious output changes are caused; this contradicts the definition.Conclude it is incorrect.Verification / Alternative check:Check standard datasheets and textbooks: noise margin = VIH(min) - VIL(max); higher margin implies better immunity and fewer spurious output transitions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Correct: Opposite of the standard meaning.Only true for open-collector TTL / Only true when VIL = VIH: These are unrelated conditions and do not redefine noise immunity.Common Pitfalls:Confusing noise susceptibility (which could cause spurious changes) with noise immunity (which prevents them); assuming output filtering alone guarantees immunity.
Final Answer:Incorrect
Discussion & Comments