Question 1

Understanding IPv6 anycast: Which statement accurately describes an IPv6 anycast address and how packets to it are delivered?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: IPv6 introduces anycast as a native addressing model. While unicast targets a single interface and multicast targets multiple interfaces, anycast provides a special pattern: the same address assigned to multiple interfaces, with delivery to the nearest (according to routing metrics). Given Data / Assumptions: Routers use standard unicast routing to reach the anycast address. Multiple devices share the same anycast address. Applications may use anycast for services like DNS resolvers or content distribution. Concept / Approach: Anycast is best summarized as “one-to-one-of-many.” The network forwards to the topologically closest instance advertising that address. This differs from multicast (one-to-many) and unicast (one-to-one). The behavior is determined by routing, not by special transport signaling. Step-by-Step Solution: Assign the same IPv6 anycast address to multiple servers/routers.Announce that prefix in the routing domain.Clients sending to the anycast address are routed to the nearest instance. Verification / Alternative check: Tracing from different network locations shows traffic reaching different anycast endpoints depending on topology and metrics. No special host configuration beyond using the anycast destination is required. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (A) defines unicast, not anycast. (B) defines multicast delivery semantics. (D) loosely describes unique-local or special-use addresses, not anycast behavior. Common Pitfalls: Confusing anycast with load balancing at Layer 4; assuming packets are duplicated like multicast; forgetting that failure or withdrawal of one instance causes routing to shift to another seamlessly. Final Answer: This address identifies multiple interfaces and the anycast packet is only delivered to one address. This address can also be called one-to-one-of-many.

Question 2

Understanding IPv6 link-local addresses: Which statement correctly describes IPv6 link-local addresses and their routing characteristics?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Every IPv6 interface automatically configures a link-local address (fe80::/10). These addresses are essential for neighbor discovery and local communications, but they have strict scope and routing rules compared to global unicast addresses. Given Data / Assumptions: Link-local scope is a single Layer 2 segment (link). Routers must not forward link-local packets between links. Examples: router neighbor adjacencies, SLAAC operations. Concept / Approach: Link-local addresses are nonroutable beyond the local link. They are somewhat analogous in spirit to RFC1918 private IPv4 addresses with respect to nonroutability, though their purpose and scope are different. Global communication uses global unicast addresses (2000::/3). Step-by-Step Solution: Recognize the fe80::/10 prefix on interfaces.Note that routers will not route fe80:: traffic off-link.Use link-local for neighbor discovery and next-hop specifications on point-to-point links. Verification / Alternative check: Attempting to route to a link-local address via a router fails across subnets; packet captures show link-local traffic limited to the local segment. Routing tables will not contain routes to foreign link-local networks. Why Other Options Are Wrong: (A) is a generic unicast statement and does not address scope. (B) incorrectly claims link-local are publicly routable. (D) better fits unique-local (fc00::/7) characteristics but still not precise for link-local scope and use. Common Pitfalls: Trying to ping a remote device’s link-local address without specifying an outgoing interface; assuming link-local can traverse routers; mixing up link-local with unique-local (ULA). Final Answer: These are like private addresses in IPv4 in that they are not meant to be routed.

Question 3

IPv6 address rules: Which combination of statements about IPv6 addressing is correct?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: IPv6 textual representation includes several rules that reduce address length while preserving unambiguous interpretation. Knowing which statements are valid ensures accurate configuration and troubleshooting. Given Data / Assumptions: (1) Leading zeros are required. (2) Two colons (::) are used to represent successive hexadecimal fields of zeros. (3) Two colons (::) are used to separate fields. (4) A single interface will often have multiple IPv6 addresses of different types. Concept / Approach: Correct rules: Leading zeros are optional, not required. Double-colon (::) denotes one contiguous run of zero 16-bit blocks and may appear only once in an address. Field separation uses single colons. Interfaces typically hold multiple addresses (link-local, global unicast, possibly unique-local, and temporary/privacy addresses). Step-by-Step Solution: Reject (1): leading zeros are optional and may be suppressed.Accept (2): :: compresses one sequence of zero blocks.Reject (3): single colon separates hextets; :: is not a separator.Accept (4): multiple addresses on one interface are normal in IPv6. Verification / Alternative check: Examples: 2001:db8:0:0:0:0:0:1 can be 2001:db8::1; 2001:db8:1:0:0:0:0:abcd becomes 2001:db8:1::abcd. Devices show both link-local and global unicast on the same interface with show commands. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any choice including (1) or (3) conflicts with IPv6 textual rules. Common Pitfalls: Using :: more than once; forgetting that :: can represent different counts of zeros depending on the rest of the address; assuming each interface has only one address as in traditional IPv4. Final Answer: 2 and 4

Question 4

IPv6 addressing fundamentals — identifying a unicast address behaviour In Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) networking, which statement correctly describes the delivery semantics of a unicast address (that is, any IPv6 address type that represents …

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding the basic categories of Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) addresses is crucial for network design and troubleshooting. IPv6 defines several address types, including unicast, anycast, and multicast. This question focuses on what makes a unicast address unique: it represents a single destination interface so that traffic is delivered to exactly one endpoint in normal operation. Given Data / Assumptions: We are comparing IPv6 address categories conceptually. We assume standard behaviour without special features such as anycast configured on identical addresses across multiple nodes. No tunnelling, NAT64, or traffic engineering tricks are assumed. Concept / Approach: In IPv6, a unicast address identifies a single interface. A packet sent to a unicast destination is forwarded by routers along the best path and ultimately delivered to the one interface that owns that address. This is different from multicast (one to many) and different from anycast (one to nearest of many, where the same address is configured on multiple interfaces and routing selects the closest). Global unicast, unique local, and link-local are all subtypes of unicast; they differ by scope and routability, not by the fundamental “one destination interface” delivery model. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the core definition: unicast means one-to-one delivery.Differentiate from multicast (one-to-many) and anycast (one-to-nearest-of-many).Recognize that global unicast, unique local, and link-local are all still unicast subtypes and therefore follow one-to-one delivery semantics.Select the statement that reflects one-to-one delivery to a single interface. Verification / Alternative check: Check any standard IPv6 reference: unicast traffic has a single intended receiver, multicast traffic is replicated to group members, and anycast traffic is delivered to the nearest node advertising the shared anycast address. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B: Describes global unicast specifically, not unicast as a general behaviour, and is incomplete. C: Describes unique local addresses by analogy to IPv4 private space, not unicast as a whole. D: Describes link-local addresses being nonroutable and nearly unique; still not the defining unicast behaviour. E: Replication to multiple receivers is multicast, not unicast. Common Pitfalls: Confusing unicast as a subtype instead of a category. Recall that global unicast, unique local, and link-local are all unicast, but the essential characteristic is single-interface delivery. Final Answer: Packets addressed to a unicast address are delivered to a single interface.

Question 5

Enabling EIGRP for IPv6 (EIGRPv6) on Cisco IOS — required configuration elements Which of the following configuration lines are used together to enable EIGRP for IPv6 on a Cisco router (assume autonomous system 10)? Select the correct combination th…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol for IPv6 (EIGRPv6) uses a process-based configuration model. Unlike classic EIGRP for IPv4, EIGRPv6 requires you to create and start an IPv6 EIGRP process and then enable that process on participating interfaces. Understanding the exact sequence and context of commands is essential to bring adjacencies up and advertise prefixes correctly. Given Data / Assumptions: The autonomous system number is 10. We are using standard Cisco IOS style configuration. At least one interface has IPv6 enabled and is up/up. Concept / Approach: EIGRPv6 requires three parts: (1) create the EIGRP for IPv6 process under global configuration, (2) ensure the EIGRPv6 process is administratively enabled with no shutdown (this is mandatory for EIGRPv6), and (3) activate EIGRPv6 on desired interfaces using ipv6 eigrp . There is no network statement model as with IPv4. Interface-level enablement controls which links participate in the protocol. Step-by-Step Solution: Enter global config and create the process: ipv6 router eigrp 10.Inside the EIGRPv6 process context, issue: no shutdown.On each participating interface, enable the process: ipv6 eigrp 10.Verify neighbors with show ipv6 eigrp neighbors and routes with show ipv6 route eigrp. Verification / Alternative check: Use show running-config to confirm the router configuration blocks. The presence of the process with no shutdown and interface-level activation indicates a correct setup. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: Mixes OSPFv3 with EIGRP; protocols and contexts do not match. C: Uses RIPng context and an EIGRP interface command together, which is invalid. D: The process must be enabled and attached to interfaces; no shutdown alone is insufficient. E: Interface-only configuration fails because the router process must exist and be active. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting the no shutdown inside the EIGRPv6 process or assuming IPv4-style network statements apply to IPv6. Both will prevent adjacency formation. Final Answer: Router1(config)# ipv6 router eigrp 10; Router1(config-rtr)# no shutdown; Router1(config-if)# ipv6 eigrp 10

Question 6

Control-plane multicast in IPv6 — which multicast group does EIGRP for IPv6 (EIGRPv6) use for neighbor discovery and updates?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: IPv6 routing protocols use specific link-local multicast groups to discover neighbors and exchange control information efficiently on a segment. Knowing the correct multicast addresses helps engineers interpret packet captures and verify control-plane health using tools like debug and show commands. Given Data / Assumptions: We are concerned with EIGRP for IPv6 (often written EIGRPv6). We are considering link-local scope multicast addresses (FF02::/16). No authentication or special transport changes are assumed. Concept / Approach: EIGRPv6 uses the all-EIGRP-routers IPv6 multicast address FF02::A for neighbor discovery and control updates. Other common addresses include FF02::5 (all OSPF routers), FF02::6 (all OSPF designated routers), and FF02::9 (RIPng). FF02::1 is the all-nodes address and is not used for routing protocol control traffic. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the protocol in question: EIGRP for IPv6.Recall the standard control multicast address mapping.Select FF02::A as the EIGRPv6 group for neighbor and update traffic. Verification / Alternative check: Packet captures on an EIGRPv6-enabled interface show EIGRP packets to destination FF02::A. show ipv6 eigrp interfaces can also confirm active operation on links using that multicast address. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B: FF02::9 is used by RIPng. C/D: FF02::5 and FF02::6 are used by OSPFv3 (all routers and all DRs respectively). E: FF02::1 is the all-nodes address; using it for routing updates would be inefficient and noisy. Common Pitfalls: Mixing OSPFv3 and EIGRPv6 groups or assuming the same values as in IPv4 where multicast addresses differ. Final Answer: FF02::A

Question 7

Control-plane multicast in IPv6 — which multicast group does RIPng (RIP for IPv6) use for its updates?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Routing protocols in IPv6 rely on specific link-local multicast groups to confine control-plane exchanges to directly attached peers. Recognizing the multicast group for a given protocol allows quick validation with packet captures and simplifies troubleshooting adjacency problems. Given Data / Assumptions: We are examining RIP next generation (RIPng) for IPv6. We focus on the destination multicast address used for periodic updates and triggered updates. Concept / Approach: RIPng uses the link-local multicast address FF02::9 to send routing updates to all RIP-enabled routers on the local link. Other common control groups are FF02::A for EIGRPv6 and FF02::5/FF02::6 for OSPFv3. Using link-local scope prevents unnecessary propagation beyond the local network segment. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the protocol: RIPng.Recall the IPv6 multicast mapping: RIPng → FF02::9.Choose FF02::9 as the correct answer. Verification / Alternative check: Sniff traffic on an interface with RIPng enabled and you will observe UDP port 521 packets destined to FF02::9. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: FF02::A is for EIGRPv6. C/D: FF02::5 and FF02::6 are OSPFv3 control groups. E: FF02::1 (all-nodes) is not used for routing protocol updates. Common Pitfalls: Confusing RIPng with OSPFv3 multicast groups and forgetting that IPv6 uses different addresses than IPv4 multicast control groups. Final Answer: FF02::9

Question 8

IPv6 unique local addresses (ULA) — behaviour and scope Which statement correctly describes a unique local address (ULA) in IPv6 and its intended routing scope?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: IPv6 unique local addresses (ULAs) provide an address space for internal use within organizations, analogous to private address blocks in IPv4. Engineers use ULAs to number internal links and hosts without exposing them to the public Internet, while still enjoying globally unique assignments that reduce collision risk during mergers or VPN interconnects. Given Data / Assumptions: ULA prefix range is typically FC00::/7, commonly FD00::/8 for locally assigned space. ULAs are unicast addresses with limited routing scope (internal only). No NAT66 or special exception routing is assumed. Concept / Approach: ULAs are intended for intra-organization communication and are not advertised on the public Internet. They are still unicast addresses (one-to-one delivery), but their reach is restricted by policy and design. The pseudo-random Global ID component in a ULA helps avoid collisions when two private networks interconnect, improving on IPv4 private space where overlap is common. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify that the question targets ULA behaviour, not global unicast or link-local.Recall that ULA is conceptually similar to IPv4 private ranges (for example, 10.0.0.0/8), meaning “not routed on the public Internet”.Select the option that states these addresses are not meant to be publicly routed. Verification / Alternative check: Examine typical provider BGP policies and IPv6 best practices that filter FC00::/7 from public advertisement. Packet captures on Internet edges will not show ULA prefixes in global routing tables. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: True for any unicast, but not specific to the ULA concept. B: Describes global unicast behaviour, not ULAs. D: Describes link-local style nonroutable semantics, but ULAs are routable internally across sites, just not on the public Internet. E: Loopback is ::1/128; ULAs are assignable to normal interfaces. Common Pitfalls: Confusing ULAs with link-local addresses (FE80::/10). Link-local addresses are strictly one-hop only; ULAs can route within private domains. Final Answer: These are like private addresses in IPv4 in that they are not meant to be routed on the public Internet.

Question 9

Bit lengths and representation — comparing IPv4 and IPv6 address formats Which statement pair about address length and common representation is correct for IPv4 and IPv6?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Address size and human-readable representation differ between IPv4 and IPv6. Knowing the bit length and typical textual form is foundational for subnetting, ACLs, and troubleshooting. This question checks recognition of the correct pairing: IPv4 uses 32 bits and decimal dotted-quad notation, while IPv6 uses 128 bits and hexadecimal colon-separated notation. Given Data / Assumptions: We consider the canonical and most common text representations. Compressed forms for IPv6 (for example, ::) are allowed but still hexadecimal. No unusual binary or base-85 display formats are considered. Concept / Approach: IPv4 addresses are 32 bits and are usually printed as four decimal octets separated by dots (for example, 192.0.2.1). IPv6 addresses are 128 bits and are usually shown as eight 16-bit hexadecimal hextets separated by colons (for example, 2001:db8::1). Therefore, the correct statements are: “An IPv4 address is 32 bits long, represented in decimal” and “An IPv6 address is 128 bits long, represented in hexadecimal.” Step-by-Step Solution: Eliminate options claiming IPv6 is 32 bits or that IPv6 uses decimal by default.Select the combination that matches IPv4 32-bit decimal and IPv6 128-bit hexadecimal.Confirm consistency with standard RFCs and vendor documentation. Verification / Alternative check: Refer to any subnetting calculator or routing protocol documentation; they uniformly treat IPv4 as 32-bit dotted-decimal and IPv6 as 128-bit hexadecimal with optional compression rules. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A/B/D: Each includes at least one false claim about address size or representation. E: Not all statements are correct; several are incorrect by definition. Common Pitfalls: Misreading “decimal” vs “hexadecimal” and assuming textual decimal implies decimal storage. Internally, both are binary; the question is about conventional notation. Final Answer: 3 and 4

Question 10

Enabling RIPng on Cisco IOS — identify the correct interface command To enable RIP next generation (RIPng) on an interface after you have already created the RIPng process (for example, Router1(config)# ipv6 router rip CURIOS), which single interfac…

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: RIP next generation (RIPng) is the IPv6 version of RIP. On Cisco IOS, RIPng follows a two-part configuration: create the RIPng process in global configuration and then enable that process on each participating interface. This is different from IPv4 RIP, which typically uses network statements under the routing process to match and activate interfaces automatically. Given Data / Assumptions: The RIPng process name (for example, CURIOS) already exists via ipv6 router rip CURIOS in global configuration mode. You now need the exact interface command to join the interface to the RIPng process. Standard Cisco IOS commands are assumed. Concept / Approach: For RIPng, enabling the protocol on an interface requires the form ipv6 rip enable under the interface. This attaches the interface to the named RIPng process and begins sending and receiving RIPng updates to the link-local multicast address FF02::9 on UDP port 521. No network statements are used for RIPng on IOS classic. Step-by-Step Solution: Create RIPng process: ipv6 router rip CURIOS (already done in the premise).On the desired interface, issue: ipv6 rip CURIOS enable.Verify with show ipv6 rip and show ipv6 protocols to ensure the interface is active in the process. Verification / Alternative check: Packet capture on the interface will show RIPng updates to FF02::9 once the interface command is present. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B: ipv6 router rip belongs to global configuration, not interface configuration. C/D: These commands enable OSPFv3 and EIGRPv6 respectively, not RIPng. E: ripng enable is not valid IOS syntax; IOS uses the ipv6 rip enable form. Common Pitfalls: Forgetting that RIPng is enabled per interface and using IPv4-style network statements, which will not work. Also, placing ipv6 router rip under an interface is a mode error. Final Answer: Router1(config-if)# ipv6 rip CURIOS enable

Question 11

IPv6 global unicast addresses — scope and routability Which statement correctly describes an IPv6 global unicast address and how it compares to familiar IPv4 addressing?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: IPv6 replaces IPv4 public addressing with a much larger, structured global address space. Global unicast addresses (GUA) provide globally routable identifiers for hosts and routers, enabling end-to-end connectivity without the pervasive network address translation typical of IPv4 deployments. Given Data / Assumptions: Global unicast addresses commonly fall under 2000::/3. We consider default Internet routing policies that accept and propagate GUAs. No special constraints such as uRPF failures or route filtering beyond normal practices are assumed. Concept / Approach: Global unicast addresses are the IPv6 equivalent of globally routable IPv4 addresses. They are intended to be advertised via BGP on the Internet, reachable across domains, and used for server and client addressing where global reachability is required. They are distinct from unique local addresses (internal only) and link-local addresses (single-hop only). Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the scope: GUA provides Internet-wide routability.Contrast with ULA (internal only) and link-local (nonrouted).Select the answer that explicitly states public, global routability similar to IPv4 public addresses. Verification / Alternative check: Examine global BGP tables to find prefixes under 2000::/3. These are propagated and reachable across providers, demonstrating their public routability. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: True for any unicast, but does not distinguish GUA. C: Describes ULA semantics, not GUA. D/E: Describe nonrouted categories (for example, link-local) and are inconsistent with global routing. Common Pitfalls: Assuming all unicast in IPv6 is globally routable. Only GUA has that intended scope; ULA and link-local have more limited reach. Final Answer: These are your typical publicly routable addresses, comparable to globally routable IPv4 addresses.

Question 12

Enabling OSPFv3 on an interface — selecting the correct IOS command Which command enables OSPFv3 for IPv6 on an interface and assigns it to area 0 on a Cisco router?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Open Shortest Path First version 3 (OSPFv3) is the IPv6-capable iteration of OSPF. On Cisco IOS, OSPFv3 is activated per interface with a process ID and an area assignment. Choosing the correct command ensures the interface participates in the link-state domain and exchanges LSAs with neighbors. Given Data / Assumptions: We want to enable OSPFv3 on a specific interface. Area 0 (the backbone) is the intended area. Standard IOS syntax is in use. Concept / Approach: OSPFv3 is configured per interface using ipv6 ospf area . Unlike OSPFv2 for IPv4, which commonly uses network statements under the routing process, OSPFv3 relies on explicit interface activation. Both area 0 and area 0.0.0.0 are valid representations of the backbone area. Step-by-Step Solution: Enter interface configuration mode for the target interface.Issue: ipv6 ospf 10 area 0.0.0.0 (or area 0).Verify neighbor formation with show ipv6 ospf neighbor and check LSAs with show ipv6 ospf database. Verification / Alternative check: Confirm that the interface shows “Network Type” and that Hello packets are exchanged to FF02::5 and FF02::6 multicast groups. Why Other Options Are Wrong: B/C/E: These commands are for RIPng or EIGRPv6, not OSPFv3. D: no shutdown under an OSPF process context is not how OSPFv3 is activated. OSPFv3 process creation is separate and interface-based activation is required. Common Pitfalls: Trying to use IPv4 OSPF network statements for IPv6 OSPFv3. That method does not activate OSPFv3 on interfaces in classic IOS. Final Answer: Router1(config-if)# ipv6 ospf 10 area 0.0.0.0

Question 13

OSPFv3 control-plane multicast — selecting the correct groups OSPFv3 uses two well-known IPv6 link-local multicast addresses for hello, database exchange, and LSA flooding. Which pair lists those two addresses?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Every IPv6-capable routing protocol uses specific link-local multicast groups to constrain control-plane chatter to the local segment. OSPFv3 has two groups: one for all OSPF routers and one for designated routers (DR/BDR) on multiaccess networks. Recognizing these targets helps decode control-plane traffic and confirm healthy adjacencies. Given Data / Assumptions: We are selecting from the set {FF02::A, FF02::9, FF02::5, FF02::6}. We assume standard OSPFv3 operation on broadcast or NBMA segments. Concept / Approach: OSPFv3 uses FF02::5 (AllSPFRouters) for general hello and LSA flooding to all routers participating on the link. It uses FF02::6 (AllDRouters) for messages intended for designated routers and backups to reduce flooding overhead on multiaccess networks. FF02::9 is RIPng and FF02::A is EIGRPv6, so they do not apply to OSPFv3. Step-by-Step Solution: Map each option to its protocol: ::5 and ::6 → OSPFv3; ::9 → RIPng; ::A → EIGRPv6.Select the pair that includes ::5 and ::6. Verification / Alternative check: Use a packet capture on an OSPFv3-enabled interface; hello packets will target FF02::5, and certain LSAs and acknowledgments use FF02::6 when DR/BDR roles exist. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A/B/C: These omit at least one of the required OSPFv3 multicast addresses. E: Includes extra addresses not used by OSPFv3 (RIPng or EIGRPv6 groups). Common Pitfalls: Confusing OSPFv3 groups with EIGRPv6 and RIPng or assuming the same multicast addresses as in IPv4, which differ. Final Answer: 3 and 4

Question 14

IP addressing fundamentals: which statement correctly describes a multicast address in IP networking?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: In Internet Protocol (both IPv4 and IPv6), addresses can represent different delivery semantics. Understanding the distinction between unicast, multicast, anycast, and special-purpose addresses is essential for routing, switching, and application design (for example, streaming or conferencing). Given Data / Assumptions: The question asks specifically about multicast addressing. We compare multicast behavior with unicast and other types described in the options. No numeric calculation is required; this is a conceptual classification question. Concept / Approach: Unicast delivers one-to-one, multicast delivers one-to-many, anycast delivers one-to-one-of-many (nearest instance), and broadcast (IPv4 only) delivers one-to-all within a broadcast domain. Multicast uses group addresses joined by receivers; senders transmit once and the network replicates as needed. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify what multicast means: delivery to a set of interested receivers that have joined a group.Map this to option language: “delivered to all interfaces identified by the address” and “one-to-many.”Exclude unicast (single interface) and anycast (one-to-one-of-many).Confirm that the remaining descriptions do not match multicast semantics. Verification / Alternative check: Recall IPv4 Class D range (224.0.0.0 to 239.255.255.255) or IPv6 multicast prefix ff00::/8, both defined for one-to-many delivery where receivers explicitly join groups. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: Describes unicast (one-to-one), not multicast. C: Describes anycast; traffic goes to one (typically nearest) member of a set, not all. D: Sounds like unique local or special addresses; not a multicast definition. Common Pitfalls: Confusing anycast with multicast and assuming multicast means broadcast. In multicast, only joined receivers get the traffic; it is not flooded everywhere. Final Answer: Packets are delivered to all interfaces identified by the address. This is also called a one-to-many address.

Question 15

IPv6 basics: what command pings the local host's loopback address (IPv6)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Loopback addresses provide a way to test the local TCP/IP stack without sending traffic to the network. In IPv6, the loopback address differs from the familiar IPv4 value and is frequently used for troubleshooting and verification. Given Data / Assumptions: Task: Identify the correct syntax to ping the IPv6 loopback. We assume a generic operating system CLI where the command is simply ping. Concept / Approach: IPv4 loopback is 127.0.0.1. By contrast, IPv6 loopback is the single address ::1, which is shorthand for 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1. It represents the local node only and never appears on the wire. Step-by-Step Solution: Recall the IPv6 loopback address: ::1.Construct the ping command using that address: ping ::1.Verify that other listed addresses are IPv4 or invalid syntaxes for this task. Verification / Alternative check: Running ping ::1 should immediately return replies if the IPv6 stack is enabled. Tools may use ping6 on some systems, but the target address remains ::1. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: 127.0.0.1 is the IPv4 loopback, not IPv6. B: 0.0.0.0 is not a host loopback; it represents the default route or an unspecified address in IPv4 contexts. D: Not a valid command or address format for loopback testing. Common Pitfalls: Assuming that IPv4 loopback syntax carries over to IPv6. Always remember that IPv6 uses ::1 for loopback and hexadecimal colon-separated notation. Final Answer: ping ::1

IPv6 Questions