Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Correct
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
 Universal gates such as NAND are powerful because they can realize a variety of logic functions under different signal conventions. In negative logic, the logical meaning of 0/1 is swapped (low = asserted, high = deasserted), which changes how we interpret familiar gates. This question asks whether a NAND gate corresponds to a negative-OR function under that convention.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
 In positive logic, NAND(A,B) = NOT(A * B). Under negative logic interpretation, complementing input and output senses maps NAND to OR. Intuitively, if low level “means” true, then a NAND’s output low occurs precisely when either input is low-true, aligning with OR semantics in the negative domain. This is a classic duality used in logic families and active-LOW signal design.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
 De Morgan’s law confirms NOT(A * B) = NOT(A) + NOT(B). Interpreting inputs as active-LOW means the gate acts like OR on the active meanings. Textbooks present NAND as negative-OR and NOR as negative-AND under signal inversion conventions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
 Claims about Schmitt triggers, low frequency, or CMOS-only are hardware distractions; the equivalence is logical and independent of device technology or speed regime.
Common Pitfalls:
 Mixing physical voltage levels with logical meaning. Remember that changing the active sense (positive vs negative logic) changes the interpretation of the same hardware function.
Final Answer:
 Correct
Discussion & Comments