The nearest integer to 58701 which is exactly divisible by 567 is
Aptitude
Number System
Difficulty: Medium
Choose an option
-
A55968
-
B58068
-
C58968
-
DNone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: 58968
Explanation
### Concept & Logic
"Nearest integer" problems require evaluating two candidate multiples: the one immediately below the base number, and the one immediately above it.
After dividing the base by the divisor to find the remainder $R$, we compare the distances:
* Distance to lower multiple $= R$
* Distance to upper multiple $= \text{Divisor} - R$
The required answer corresponds to whichever distance is numerically smaller.
### Step-by-Step Solution
* **Step 1:** Divide the base number by the divisor to find the remainder.
$58701 \div 567$
* **Step 2:** Execute long division.
$587 \div 567 = 1$. Remainder is $20$.
Bring down $0$ to make $200$. $200 \div 567 = 0$. Remainder is $200$.
Bring down $1$ to make $2001$.
$2001 \div 567 = 3$. ($567 \times 3 = 1701$).
Remainder $= 2001 - 1701 = 300$.
* **Step 3:** Calculate the two distances.
Distance down $= 300$
Distance up $= 567 - 300 = 267$
* **Step 4:** Compare the distances to find the nearest integer.
Since $267 < 300$, the upper multiple is strictly closer to the base number.
We find it by adding the upward distance:
$58701 + 267 = 58968$.
### Exam Strategy & Shortcut
**Block Approximation:** Look at the first three digits of the dividend and divisor.
We know $567 \times 100 = 56700$. Let's subtract this large chunk from our target.
$58701 - 56700 = 2001$.
Now we only need to find the nearest multiple of $567$ to $2001$.
$567 \times 3 = 1701$ (Gap of $300$)
$567 \times 4 = 2268$ (Gap of $267$)
The multiple $2268$ is closer to $2001$.
So, $56700 + 2268 = 58968$ is the nearest integer. This avoids formal long division entirely.
### Common Pitfall
A major trap is always subtracting the remainder by default, which yields the nearest *lower* integer ($58701 - 300 = 58401$). The phrase "nearest integer" is bidirectional. You must always check whether rounding up or rounding down provides a shorter absolute distance.
### Final Answer
**Therefore, the correct answer is 58968.**