Concept check: Is multiple inheritance (deriving from more than one base class) the same as multilevel inheritance (a chain Base → Derived → MoreDerived)? Provide the best judgment.

Introduction / Context:
This question differentiates two foundational inheritance patterns: multiple inheritance and multilevel inheritance. Understanding the difference is vital when modeling type hierarchies and predicting method lookup and data layout behavior.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Multiple inheritance: a class has more than one immediate base class.
• Multilevel inheritance: inheritance forms a chain across several generations.
• Languages vary in their support for these patterns.

Concept / Approach:
In multiple inheritance, a single class derives from two or more bases, e.g., class D : public B1, public B2 { }; In multilevel inheritance, each class derives from at most one immediate base, but across levels: A → B → C. These notions address orthogonal structure: breadth (multiple) vs depth (multilevel). Confusing them can lead to mistaken assumptions about diamond problems and virtual inheritance — issues specifically relevant to multiple inheritance, not multilevel per se.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Draw both diagrams and observe that multilevel never has two parents at the same level for a class, while multiple always does for the derived class in question.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Equivalence: incorrect — definitions differ.
• “Only with virtual inheritance”: virtual inheritance mitigates diamond issues but does not equate the two forms.
• Language-specific equivalence claims are inaccurate; the concepts remain distinct regardless of language.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming “more than one level” implies “more than one base”; or thinking that multilevel inherently causes diamond problems (it does not).

Final Answer:
Correct — they are distinct concepts; multiple ≠ multilevel.