Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Both statements I and II together are sufficient, but neither alone is sufficient.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:The task is to determine the minimum passing percentage (passing marks expressed as a percentage of total marks). This is a sufficiency check, not merely arithmetic.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:To get the passing percentage, we need both the total marks (denominator) and the minimum passing marks (numerator). Statement I can reveal total marks; Statement II can relate passing marks to Raman’s score.
Step-by-Step Solution:
From I: Let total marks be M. Raman = 0.25 M. Sunil = Raman + 128 = 288 ⇒ Raman = 160 ⇒ 0.25 M = 160 ⇒ M = 640.From II: Passing marks P_min = Raman + 64 = 160 + 64 = 224.Passing percentage = (P_min / M) * 100 = (224 / 640)*100 = 35% (unique).Verification / Alternative check:Neither statement alone suffices: I yields M but not P_min; II yields a difference relative to Raman but not M. Together they fix both.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Misreading “128 more than Raman” as a percentage; or treating passing marks as a fixed number across tests without computing from given data.
Final Answer:Both statements together are sufficient; neither alone is sufficient.
Discussion & Comments