Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question matches classic instruments to what they measure, spanning frequency counting, dielectric testing, insulation-resistance measurement, and spectral analysis. Mastery of these pairings aids in selecting the right tool for RF, power, and materials labs.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Use each instrument’s defining capability: counters time zero-crossings/pulses, bridges compare impedances to extract dielectric loss, meggers characterize insulation via megohm-scale resistance, and spectrum analysers resolve frequency-domain content including harmonics and intermodulation products.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Typical lab procedures: frequency counter on a known RF source; Schering bridge datasheets emphasize tan δ; meggers specify ranges in MΩ to GΩ; spectrum analysers display multi-tone spectra showing harmonics clearly.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Assigning the megger to “harmonics” or the counter to “loss angle” ignores instrument physics. The Schering bridge targets dielectric characterization, not frequency counting.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing an oscilloscope (time-domain) with a spectrum analyser (frequency-domain); using a multimeter for insulation tests where a megger is appropriate due to higher test voltage.
Final Answer:
A-2, B-3, C-4, D-1
Discussion & Comments