Digital logic families — match each family to its hallmark characteristic List I (Logic family) A. TTL (Transistor–Transistor Logic) B. ECL (Emitter-Coupled Logic) C. MOS (PMOS/NMOS families) D. CMOS (Complementary MOS) List II (Trait) 1. Low propagation delay (very fast) 2. Low power consumption 3. High packing density 4. Saturated bipolar logic
-
AA-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
-
BA-4, B-3, C-1, D-2
-
CA-4, B-3, C-2, D-1
-
DA-3, B-1, C-4, D-2
Answer
Correct Answer: A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Comparing logic families is a staple of digital electronics. Each technology balances speed, power, and integration density differently. Recognizing these trade-offs guides family selection for timing-critical vs. low-power applications.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- TTL uses saturated bipolar transistors.
- ECL avoids saturation via emitter-coupled differential pairs.
- MOS (pre-CMOS) emphasizes integration density compared with bipolar.
- CMOS leverages complementary devices for very low static power.
Concept / Approach:Map families to their hallmark: TTL → saturated bipolar (4); ECL → fastest, low propagation delay (1); MOS → high packing density (3); CMOS → low power consumption (2). While modern variants blur lines, the classical properties remain correct for fundamentals.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Match A (TTL) → 4.Match B (ECL) → 1.Match C (MOS) → 3.Match D (CMOS) → 2.Verification / Alternative check:Family datasheets and textbooks list typical t_pd and power numbers: ECL shows sub-nanosecond speeds at higher static power; CMOS shows nanojoule-level energy per transition and nearly zero static power.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Swapping MOS and CMOS traits confuses density with static power advantages.
- Calling TTL “fastest” ignores ECL’s unsaturated design.
Common Pitfalls:Assuming a single “best” family—real designs weigh speed, noise margins, and power together.
Final Answer:A-4, B-1, C-3, D-2