Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: None of these
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This problem tests understanding of aggregate percentages and the danger of inferring intersections without sufficient data. We are given overall percentage splits by gender, sincerity, and location, but no cross-tabulation.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Percentages of whole categories do not determine how they overlap unless additional constraints are given. Many different cross-distributions can fit the same margins, making strong statements about subgroups unjustified.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Construct examples: one distribution could place all 40% Rawalpura as males; another could place them all as females. Both satisfy the given margins but contradict (a) and (d) respectively.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Each asserts an intersection fact that the marginal totals do not uniquely determine.
Common Pitfalls:
Equating equal percentages (40% females and 40% Rawalpura) with the same set of people, or assuming uniform distribution of sincerity across genders.
Final Answer:
None of these
Discussion & Comments