Home » Logical Reasoning » Statement and Argument

Statement: Should adult education programme be given priority over compulsory education programme? Arguments: No. It will also help in success of compulsory education programme. Yes. It will help to eliminate the adult illiteracy.

Only argument I is strong
Only argument II is strong
Either I or II is strong
Neither I nor II is strong
Both I and II are strong

Correct Answer: Only argument II is strong

Explanation:

Clearly, argument I gives a reason in support of the statement and so it does not hold strong against it. The adult education programme needs to be given priority because it shall eliminate adult illiteracy and thus help in further spread of education. So, only argument II is strong enough.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should new universities be established in India? Arguments: No. We have still not achieved the target for literacy. No. We will have to face the problem of unemployed but highly qualified people.
Statement: Should non-vegetarian food be totally banned in our country? Arguments: Yes. It is expensive and therefore it is beyond the means of most people in our country. No. Nothing should be banned in a democratic country like ours.
Statement: Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals? Arguments: Yes. Trappers are making a lot of money; No. Bans on hunting and trapping are not effective.
Statement: Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises? Arguments: No. All employees will lose their jobs, security and earning, what would they do? Yes. In a competitive world the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.
Statement: Should government jobs in rural areas have more incentives? Arguments: Yes. Incentives are essential for attracting government servants there. No. Rural areas are already cheaper, healthier and less complex than big cities. So? Why offer extra incentives!
Statement: Should there be a cap on maximum number of contestants for parliamentary elections in any constituency? Arguments: Yes. This will make the parliamentary elections more meaningful as the voters can make a considered judgement for casting their vote. No. In a democracy any person fulfilling the eligibility criteria can contest parliamentary elections and there should be no restrictions.
Statement: Should so much money be spent on advertisements? Arguments: Yes. It is an essential concomitant in a capitalist economy. No. It leads to wastage of resources.
Statement: Should all the legislators be forced to resign from their profession? Arguments: Yes. They will be able to devote more time for the country. No, nobody will contest election.
Statement: Should 'computer knowledge' be made a compulsory subject for all the students at secondary school level? Arguments: No, our need is 'bread' for everyone, we cannot follow western models. Yes. We cannot compete in the international market without equipping our children with computers.
Statement: Should there be uniforms for students in the colleges in India as in the schools? Arguments: Yes, this will improve the ambience of the colleges as all the students will be decently dressed. No. The college students should not be regimented and they should be left to choose their clothes for coming to the college.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion