Arrange the stages of a typical lesson delivery in a meaningful order, from initial engagement to final evaluation: 1) Evaluation, 2) Presentation (teaching), 3) Recap, 4) Aim announcement (objectives), 5) Motivation (attention/interest).

Introduction / Context:
Instructional design commonly follows a flow: engage learners, state objectives, deliver content, summarize, and evaluate. Sequencing these pedagogy steps tests whether you can map classroom practice to a logical order that maximizes clarity and retention for students.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Items: Motivation (5), Aim announcement (4), Presentation (2), Recap (3), Evaluation (1).
• We assume a standard single-period lesson structure.

Concept / Approach:
Start by capturing attention (motivation), then clarify goals (aim). Proceed to the main teaching (presentation). Conclude with a recap to reinforce key points, and end with evaluation to check understanding. This mirrors widely recommended lesson planning models.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Motivation (5): hook and relevance.2) Aim announcement (4): explicit objectives.3) Presentation (2): core instruction.4) Recap (3): summary and consolidation.5) Evaluation (1): assessment of learning.Hence: 5, 4, 2, 3, 1.

Verification / Alternative check:
Evaluation before presentation would assess nothing; recap before presentation would summarize content not yet taught. The chosen order respects pedagogical dependencies.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Placing evaluation early contradicts its diagnostic role.
• Skipping motivation or aims reduces clarity and engagement.
• Swapping recap and presentation inverts summary logic.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming evaluation must always be only at the very end; while formative checks can appear during teaching, this simplified sequence targets the main terminal evaluation.

Final Answer:
5, 4, 2, 3, 1