Read the statement carefully: "Looking for a job is difficult enough; the task becomes impossible if you do not have the skill of being pleasant, polite and polished." Based on this statement, which of the following conclusions is definitely true?

Introduction / Context:
This is a verbal reasoning question based on a short statement about job hunting and interpersonal skills. The statement stresses the importance of being pleasant, polite and polished when searching for a job. We must carefully read what is explicitly or implicitly suggested and then select the conclusion that logically follows, without adding assumptions that are too strong or unrelated.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Main statement: Looking for a job is already difficult, and it becomes impossible if a person does not have the skill of being pleasant, polite and polished.
• The focus is on the role of soft skills (manners and behaviour) in addition to other qualifications.
• We are not told that behaviour alone guarantees success, only that the absence of these skills creates serious difficulty.

Concept / Approach:
The key idea in such questions is to distinguish between what is suggested, what is clearly implied and what would be an overstatement. The statement suggests that manners are an important factor in getting a job. It does not claim that manners are the only factor, nor that having good manners makes someone automatically eligible for every job. A valid conclusion should respect the tone and scope of the original statement without exaggerating it.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: The phrase the task becomes impossible if you do not have the skill of being pleasant, polite and polished emphasises the negative impact of poor manners on job search.Step 2: If the absence of good manners can make job searching almost impossible, then even technically strong or well qualified candidates may fail to secure jobs because of poor behaviour.Step 3: This idea is reflected in the conclusion that many candidates, no matter how excellently qualified, are likely to fail to get the jobs they try for because of their manners.Step 4: On the other hand, the statement does not say that having good manners alone makes anyone eligible for any job, so that conclusion would be too strong.Step 5: The statement also does not claim that being polite automatically guarantees a job, nor does it say that behaviour is irrelevant. So conclusions that deny the role of manners or make them the only factor are not justified.

Verification / Alternative check:
Imagine two candidates with similar technical skills, one with excellent manners and the other with rude or unpolished behaviour. The statement suggests the second candidate will find the process nearly impossible, which supports the idea that many qualified candidates lose out because of manners.Nothing in the statement indicates that a polite person is guaranteed a job or that social etiquette alone is enough for eligibility.This confirms that the correct conclusion should highlight the negative impact of bad manners, not overstate the power of good manners.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option a claims that any person who has social etiquette is eligible for any job, which goes far beyond the statement and ignores other factors like skills and experience.Option c suggests that politeness ensures an easy job search, which is not stated in the passage.Option d and option e both deny the role of manners, directly contradicting the statement that lack of manners makes the task impossible.

Common Pitfalls:
Reading too much into a short statement and turning a strong suggestion into an absolute rule.Ignoring the phrase becomes impossible and thereby underestimating the impact of behaviour on job search.Confusing the necessary condition highlighted in the statement with a sufficient condition that guarantees success.

Final Answer:
The conclusion that is most directly supported is that Many highly qualified candidates may fail to get jobs because of poor manners.