Minor losses in a well pipeline system: If the head loss due to pipe friction is 4 m, what approximate allowance should be made for additional losses in the strainer and bends (rule-of-thumb for preliminary estimates)?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 0.50 m

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
In preliminary groundwater and small water-supply designs, engineers often approximate minor losses (entries, strainers, bends, fittings) as an additive allowance to the computed pipe-friction head loss. While detailed coefficients can be used, a practical rule-of-thumb speeds early sizing and pump selection.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Pipe friction head loss h_f = 4 m (from Darcy–Weisbach or Hazen–Williams).
  • System includes a well strainer and several bends/fittings.
  • Preliminary estimate stage where a reasonable allowance is customary.


Concept / Approach:
Minor losses h_m are summed as K * V^2/(2g) over fittings and inlets. In many small well systems, the aggregate of these is often taken as about 10% to 20% of h_f or a nominal fraction of a metre. A commonly used preliminary allowance is near half a metre when friction is a few metres, pending refinement in final design.



Step-by-Step Solution:
Recognize that exact K-values depend on geometry and Reynolds number.For h_f = 4 m, choose a practical allowance h_m in the range 0.3 to 0.8 m for typical small systems.Adopt 0.50 m as a balanced preliminary allowance for strainer + bends.


Verification / Alternative check:
Detailed checks would compute K for each component: entrance to screen, screen head loss, bend coefficients, and any valves. Such detailed summation often lands near a fraction of a metre to about a metre, depending on layout—supporting the 0.50 m preliminary choice.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 0.10 m and 0.20 m: Often too low for combined strainer and multiple bends.
  • 1.00 m and 1.50 m: Possible in complex layouts, but generally conservative for a small installation with 4 m of friction loss.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Ignoring minor losses entirely, leading to undersized pumps.
  • Applying a blanket percentage without checking unusual layouts (many fittings, valves, sharp entries).


Final Answer:
0.50 m

More Questions from Water Resources Engineering

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion