Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 1000 bps
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Distance-vector routing protocols periodically exchange vectors of path metrics (for example, delays). Estimating the bandwidth consumed by these control messages is useful for capacity planning on low-speed links and for understanding protocol overheads relative to user traffic.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
On a single link between two routers, each side sends a vector containing one entry per known destination. Bits per vector equals entries * bits per entry. Multiply by update frequency to get bits per second in one direction. A full-duplex line has independent capacities in each direction, but per-direction bandwidth is usually quoted.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
If you summed both directions, the pair would total ~2000 bps, but per-direction accounting (the usual convention) yields 1000 bps. Including headers would raise the figure slightly but not change the order of magnitude.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
a: 500 bps accounts for one update per second, not two.
b: 1500 bps does not follow directly from the provided numbers.
c: 5 bps is far too low; it ignores vector length and frequency.
e: Not applicable because 1000 bps is the consistent per-direction estimate.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing per-direction (full-duplex) bandwidth with the sum of both directions; forgetting to multiply by update frequency; or miscounting destinations in the vector length.
Final Answer:
1000 bps
Discussion & Comments