Four sentences are given below as A, B, C and D. Choose the sentence that is grammatically incorrect in describing archaeological research in Sarasota documenting more than ten thousand years of seasonal occupation by native people.

Introduction / Context:
This question tests precision in scientific and historical description. All options talk about archaeological research in Sarasota and its findings about seasonal occupation by native people. You must identify the sentence that uses unnatural or incorrect wording, especially with respect to the phrase seasonal occupation and how research is described.

Given Data / Assumptions:
The topic is archaeological research in Sarasota.
The research documents more than ten thousand years of seasonal occupation by native people.
You must select the grammatically or stylistically incorrect sentence.
The focus is on proper expression in academic style English.
Assume the context is a textbook or examination passage about archaeology.

Concept / Approach:
Good academic writing refers to seasonal occupation of a region by people, not to seasonality in people themselves. We also usually say research in Sarasota or archaeological research in Sarasota, not research of Sarasota. The strategy is to look for incorrect collocations and unnatural noun phrases, even if the basic subject and verb seem fine.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Review option A. Archaeological research in Sarasota documents more than ten thousand years of seasonal occupation by native people. This is a clear and accurate sentence that matches standard academic style. Step 2: Review option B. More than ten thousand years of seasonal occupation by native people have been documented in archaeological research in Sarasota. It correctly uses a passive structure and maintains the idea of seasonal occupation. Step 3: Review option C. Archaeological research carried out in Sarasota has recorded more than ten thousand years of seasonal occupation by native people. This sentence is grammatically sound and idiomatic. Step 4: Review option D. The seasonality in native people has been documented in archaeological research of Sarasota. Step 5: The phrase seasonality in native people wrongly suggests that people themselves are seasonal, which is not the intended meaning. The correct concept is seasonal occupation of an area by people. Step 6: Additionally, archaeological research of Sarasota is less natural than archaeological research in Sarasota. For these reasons, option D is the incorrect sentence.

Verification / Alternative check:
To verify, try rephrasing option D correctly. A better sentence would be Seasonal occupation by native people has been documented in archaeological research in Sarasota. This corrected version closely resembles options A, B and C, which confirms that the original phrasing in option D is faulty and unidiomatic.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A is acceptable because it clearly states that research documents seasonal occupation by people, not seasonality in people.
Option B is acceptable because have been documented correctly refers to more than ten thousand years of occupation as a plural idea, and the prepositional phrase in archaeological research in Sarasota is natural.

Common Pitfalls:
A common mistake is to ignore subtle shifts in meaning when a single word changes. Seasonality in native people may sound scientific but is conceptually wrong in this context. Another pitfall is focusing only on tense or subject verb agreement and missing awkward prepositional phrases like research of Sarasota, which are not standard in academic English.

Final Answer:
The grammatically and stylistically incorrect sentence is Option D. The seasonality in native people has been documented in archaeological research of Sarasota.