Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: False
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This item distinguishes between magnetic flux density and hysteresis. Misdefining hysteresis leads to incorrect interpretations of core losses and material selection for magnetic components.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
“Number of lines of force per unit area” corresponds to flux density B, not hysteresis. Hysteresis refers to the lag (history dependence) in magnetic response: when H cycles, B follows a loop due to domain dynamics, causing energy loss and residual magnetization (retentivity).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Observe B–H curves from material datasheets. The loop demonstrates hysteresis; separate measurements of B (tesla) concern field intensity and geometry, not hysteresis alone.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Equating lines-of-force visuals with quantitative B; overlooking that hysteresis depends on material microstructure and frequency, while B depends on instantaneous field and geometry.
Final Answer:
False
Discussion & Comments