Magnetic circuits – Analogy check Statement: “Reluctance in a magnetic circuit is analogous to current in an electrical circuit.” Decide whether this statement is correct.

Introduction / Context:
Electrical–magnetic analogies are widely used to reason about magnetic circuits with cores, air gaps, and windings. The common “Ohm’s law” form is mmf = flux * reluctance, which invites comparisons to V = I * R in electric circuits. This question checks whether the stated analogy is correct.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Linear magnetic material behavior assumed (no deep saturation), so a simple reluctance model is meaningful.
• Sinusoidal or steady conditions; leakage and fringing ignored for the core idea.
• Symbols: mmf = magnetomotive force, Φ = flux, Rm = reluctance.

Concept / Approach:

The standard magnetic “Ohm’s law” is written as mmf = Φ * Rm. Compare with electric Ohm’s law V = I * R. Mapping terms shows mmf ↔ voltage, flux Φ ↔ current, and reluctance Rm ↔ resistance. Therefore, reluctance corresponds to resistance, not current.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:

Check power-like quantities: electric power is V * I; magnetic “power” flow conceptually involves mmf * flux. The pairings remain consistent only if reluctance ↔ resistance and flux ↔ current.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

“True” (and conditional variants) are incorrect because the analogy depends on the form of the governing equations, not on permeability being 1 or leakage being small.

Common Pitfalls:

Confusing flux density B with flux Φ; mixing field intensity H with mmf; assuming analogies change with material type. The core mapping remains mmf ↔ V, Φ ↔ I, Rm ↔ R.

Final Answer:

False.