Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: A is true but R is false
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Dielectric behavior depends on the available polarization mechanisms: electronic, ionic, and orientational (dipolar). Understanding which mechanisms are present explains why the relative permittivity εr may be temperature-independent in some materials and strongly temperature-dependent in others.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Electronic and ionic polarizations respond very rapidly and show weak temperature dependence over moderate ranges. In contrast, orientational polarization from permanent dipoles follows a Curie-like behavior, roughly proportional to 1/T, making εr decrease as temperature rises. Hence, εr can be nearly temperature-independent when permanent dipoles are absent, and temperature-dependent when they are present.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Accept Assertion: Some materials show temperature-independent εr (nonpolar), others show temperature-dependent εr (polar) → True.Evaluate Reason: It claims “if permanent dipoles are absent, εr varies with temperature.” That reverses the correct logic.Correct logic: absence of permanent dipoles → little T dependence; presence of permanent dipoles → strong T dependence.Therefore, A is true but R is false.
Verification / Alternative check:
Classical dielectric theory (Debye model) predicts εr(T) changes for dipolar materials with a 1/T trend, while electronic polarizability changes only slightly with T.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any option treating R as correct contradicts the known temperature behavior of dipolar vs non-dipolar dielectrics; declaring A false ignores well-documented material classes.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing ionic with orientational contributions; assuming all dielectrics exhibit strong temperature dependence.
Final Answer:
A is true but R is false
Discussion & Comments