In data communications, the hardware device that functions as a switching and connecting unit—selecting one of several input lines to share a single communication path—is called a multiplexer (MUX).
-
AConcentrator
-
BRS-232C port
-
CMultiplexer
-
DCommunications processor
-
ENone of the above
Answer
Correct Answer: Multiplexer
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Many devices must share limited communication links. A multiplexer (MUX) combines multiple signals for transmission over a single medium by time, frequency, or code division. It therefore acts as both a connecting element (interfacing multiple sources) and a switching element (selecting among them) according to a defined scheme.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Multiple low-speed or parallel sources must utilize one higher-capacity line.
- Selection and combination rules are defined (e.g., time slots in TDM).
- We differentiate MUX from other comms components.
Concept / Approach:A MUX connects N inputs to one output using a switching strategy. The inverse device is a demultiplexer (DEMUX). A concentrator aggregates traffic but often includes buffering and protocol handling; RS-232C is an electrical interface standard; a communications processor is a broader intelligent device (e.g., a front-end processor) that may perform protocol conversion and routing beyond mere multiplexing.
Step-by-Step Solution:Identify the function: select/combine multiple inputs onto a single path.Match the function to device type: multiplexer.Exclude alternatives based on definitions and scope.
Verification / Alternative check:Telecom systems widely use TDM multiplexers to share trunks among many voice/data channels, confirming the role as switching/connecting equipment.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Concentrator: aggregates traffic but not strictly a MUX switching function.RS-232C port: a serial interface standard, not a switching unit.Communications processor: broader intelligent device, beyond simple multiplexing.None of the above: incorrect because “Multiplexer” fits exactly.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing physical layer standards with devices; assuming any aggregator is a MUX even when it performs protocol processing or routing.
Final Answer:Multiplexer