More Questions from Automation System

FORTRAN (Formula Translation) in programming history: which description best identifies its nature among the choices below?

Computer Science Automation System Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    Machine dependent
  • B
    A medium-level language
  • C
    A mathematically oriented language
  • D
    All of the above
  • E
    None of the above

Answer

Correct Answer: A mathematically oriented language

Explanation

Introduction / Context:FORTRAN—short for Formula Translation—is one of the earliest high-level programming languages, designed to express mathematical formulas compactly and to support scientific and engineering computation. Recognising its intended domain helps distinguish it from system-focused or machine-specific languages of the same era.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The options mix claims about portability level and domain orientation.
  • Classic FORTRAN targeted numerical computing and array-heavy workloads.
  • We must select the most accurate descriptor from the list provided.

Concept / Approach:FORTRAN’s design centres on mathematics: array operations, intrinsic numeric functions, and straightforward expression of formulas. While implementations existed for many machines, calling it “machine dependent” is misleading for the language itself; and “medium-level language” is not a standard classification for FORTRAN, which is historically categorised as high-level. Therefore, the most accurate choice from the given set is that FORTRAN is a mathematically oriented language.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the primary use-case: scientific and engineering computation. Map this to language features: arrays, numeric intrinsics, formatted I/O. Reject “machine dependent” as a property of specific compilers, not the language essence. Reject “medium-level” as nonstandard for FORTRAN. Select “a mathematically oriented language.”

Verification / Alternative check:Language histories consistently present FORTRAN as the flagship for numerical computing, with enduring use in HPC and scientific codes.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Machine dependent: contradicts the goal of portable, compiled high-level code. Medium-level: FORTRAN is historically categorised as high-level. All/None: exactly one option fits well.

Common Pitfalls:Confusing the portability of source code with system-specific library calls; conflating early implementation limits with the language’s intended abstraction level.

Final Answer:A mathematically oriented language.

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion