Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: MIS manager
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Successful implementation of production and information systems requires coordination across technical and business domains. A system coordinator serves as a bridge—translating requirements between engineering, manufacturing, and information technology—so that system designs, data flows, and schedules remain consistent.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
MIS managers (or IT/IS leaders) oversee information infrastructure, applications, and data governance. Partnering them with engineering and manufacturing ensures requirements (e.g., bill of materials, work orders, quality records) flow into systems like ERP/MES/PLM. This trio prevents silos, reduces rework, and improves time-to-value by aligning process, data, and technology.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify core stakeholders: engineering, manufacturing, and MIS/IT.Map coordination needs: data models, integrations, reporting, and controls.Select the stakeholder that complements engineering and manufacturing on the systems side: MIS manager.
Verification / Alternative check:
Implementation methodologies often define steering committees including IT leaders and operations heads—mirroring the coordinator’s interface set—to ensure end-to-end alignment.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Finance manager: important for budgeting but not the primary systems integrator.President: executive oversight, not day-to-day technical coordination.Marketing manager: customer/market focus, not operations systems integration.None of the above: incorrect because MIS manager is appropriate.
Common Pitfalls:
Leaving IT out until late stages; failing to establish data ownership; overlooking cybersecurity and access control when integrating shop-floor systems.
Final Answer:
MIS manager
Discussion & Comments