Statement: Government-aided schools should have uniformity in charging various fees. Assumptions: I. The Government’s subsidy comes from tax money collected from people. II. While granting subsidy, the Government may have stipulated uniform fee conditions. Choose the option that identifies which assumption(s) is/are implicit.

Introduction / Context:
Calling for fee uniformity implies a policy basis connecting aid to standardized conditions.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Schools receive Government aid.
• Uniform fees are urged.

Concept / Approach:
To justify the statement, it must be assumed that subsidy is (or should be) conditional on certain uniform practices—specifically fees. The general origin of subsidy funds (I) is irrelevant to the need for uniformity.

Step-by-Step Solution:
I: Even if subsidies came from borrowing or other sources, the argument for uniformity stands. Not necessary.II: A plausible/necessary ground: aid entails standard conditions; otherwise “should have uniformity” lacks policy anchor. Necessary.

Verification / Alternative check:
Remove II and the directive appears arbitrary.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Including I confuses funding source with fee rules.

Final Answer:
if only Assumption II is implicit