Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: non-coplanar concurrent forces
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Classifying force systems helps select appropriate equilibrium equations. In three dimensions, concurrency (meeting at a point) and coplanarity (lying in one plane) are independent attributes. Recognizing a non-coplanar concurrent system allows simplification to moment sums about the intersection point along with vector force balance.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Concurrent implies a single intersection point; non-coplanar implies three-dimensional arrangement. Such systems are solvable using ΣF = 0 in vector form without needing separate couple-moment equations about arbitrary origins (since moments about the concurrency point from each force are zero).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Drawing skew lines converging at a point confirms three-dimensional geometry with concurrency.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Coplanar non-concurrent: either coplanar or non-concurrent is violated. Non-coplanar non-concurrent do not meet at one point. “Intersecting forces (same plane)” contradict non-coplanarity.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing skew lines with parallel forces; assuming concurrency implies coplanarity.
Final Answer:
non-coplanar concurrent forces
Discussion & Comments