Clinical differentiation within Enterobacteriaceae: How can Enterobacter species be reliably distinguished from Klebsiella species during routine biochemical identification in the microbiology laboratory?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: both (a) and (b)

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Enterobacter and Klebsiella are closely related Gram-negative rods in the family Enterobacteriaceae. They share many traits (lactose fermentation in many strains, oxidase negativity, facultative anaerobiosis), so bench-level differentiation depends on a few key biochemical and phenotypic tests. This question focuses on the two most practical differences used in clinical bacteriology workflows.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • We are comparing typical clinical isolates of Enterobacter (e.g., E. cloacae complex) and Klebsiella (e.g., K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca).
  • Standard bench tests include motility and decarboxylase reactions (especially ornithine decarboxylase).
  • Interpretations assume incubation and media conditions are correct.



Concept / Approach:
Klebsiella species are classically non-motile due to lack of functional flagella and are generally ornithine decarboxylase negative. In contrast, Enterobacter species are motile (peritrichous flagella) and many clinically encountered Enterobacter (notably E. cloacae complex) are ornithine decarboxylase positive. Pairing these two traits gives a robust separation in most routine cases.



Step-by-Step Solution:
Confirm motility: Enterobacter = motile; Klebsiella = non-motile.Check ornithine decarboxylase: Enterobacter (many species) = positive; Klebsiella (typical) = negative.Combine results to differentiate the genera.Choose the option that includes both discriminators.



Verification / Alternative check:
Additional corroborating tests (e.g., urease stronger in Klebsiella; arginine dihydrolase profiles; MALDI-TOF MS) align with the motility/ornithine pattern, supporting the identification.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Ornithine positivity alone: helpful but stronger when combined with motility.
  • Motility alone: helpful but not sufficient if atypical strains occur.
  • None of these: incorrect because both markers are classically used.



Common Pitfalls:
Reading decarboxylase tests too early or using dextrose-rich carryover can give false results; always verify controls and incubation times.



Final Answer:
both (a) and (b)

More Questions from Spirochacter and Enterobacteriaceac

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion