Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: 1:100 or more
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The Widal test measures agglutinating antibodies against Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi antigens (O and H). While culture remains the gold standard, Widal is still used in resource-limited settings. Knowing typical significance thresholds helps avoid over- or under-diagnosis.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In many endemic regions, an O agglutinin titre of 1:100 or greater is commonly taken as significant in the right clinical context, recognizing that local baseline titres and lab-specific cutoffs vary. Lower titres (e.g., 1:50) are often non-specific; higher cutoffs (e.g., 1:150) may be too stringent in some locales.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify standard threshold used in many labs for O antibodies.Balance sensitivity and specificity in endemic settings.Select 1:100 or more as a generally significant titre (with clinical correlation).Note that paired sera showing a fourfold rise is most diagnostic.
Verification / Alternative check:
Local public health guidelines often publish baseline titre distributions; many cite O ≥ 1:100 as significant when supported by symptoms and epidemiology.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Relying solely on a single Widal titre without considering clinical picture, vaccination history, or alternative diagnoses.
Final Answer:
1:100 or more
Discussion & Comments