Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Correct
Explanation:
Introduction / Context: Many standard BCD counters (e.g., 74xx160/2/3/4 families or FPGA IP) provide standardized control pins for cascading. ENT (or similar count-enable) allows the counter to increment only under certain conditions, while RCO asserts when the counter reaches its terminal count and rolls over. Together, they build multi-digit counters without glitches.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach: On each active clock edge, the ones digit counts freely while ENT is HIGH. When it rolls from 9 to 0, RCO pulses HIGH, enabling the tens digit’s ENT for exactly one clock, thus incrementing the tens digit by one. This is synchronous cascading—every flip-flop is clocked together, avoiding the skew and ripple delays of asynchronous chaining.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Connect common CLK to all counter stages.Route ones.RCO to tens.ENT (possibly ORed with other enables such as global run).Constrain the tens counter to MOD-6 for minutes/seconds tens digit.Verify that the tens digit advances exactly when ones digit rolls over.Verification / Alternative check: Simulate several minutes of counting; confirm that transitions happen only at rollovers and that there are no intermediate illegal BCD states.
Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Incorrect” ignores how standard counter cascading works. “Valid only in asynchronous ripple counters” reverses the concept—RCO/ENT are specifically helpful for synchronous operation. “Works only if ENT is active LOW” is a polarity confusion; the method works with either polarity as long as logic is consistent.
Common Pitfalls: Forgetting to gate ENT properly, causing double counts; mixing asynchronous ripple with synchronous stages; failing to reset digits at their terminal counts.
Final Answer: Correct
Discussion & Comments