TR (transmit–receive) protection tube in radar duplexers: how does its loss behave for weak echo signals versus the strong transmit pulse?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Low loss for weak (low-level) echo signals and high loss for the strong transmit pulse

Explanation:


Introduction:
In pulsed radar, a duplexer must protect the sensitive receiver during the high-power transmit pulse and then admit very weak echoes a short time later. Gas-discharge TR tubes (or modern limiter diodes) provide level-dependent isolation.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Monostatic radar with a single antenna shared by transmitter and receiver.
  • TR device placed in the receiver path.
  • Transmit pulse is orders of magnitude stronger than echoes.


Concept / Approach:

During the transmit pulse, the TR device ionizes or otherwise switches into a high-loss/reflective state, isolating the receiver front end. Between pulses, with only weak echo levels present, the device remains non-conducting (or unswitched), presenting low insertion loss so echoes reach the receiver with minimal attenuation.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Transmit interval: incident power is very high → TR tube conducts → high attenuation to receiver path.2) Listen interval: only weak echoes arrive → device remains off → low insertion loss.3) Net effect: receiver is protected yet remains sensitive post-pulse.


Verification / Alternative check:

Limiter transfer curves show a knee beyond which insertion loss increases rapidly with input power; below the knee, loss is minimal.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Reversing which level gets high loss would either damage the receiver or block echoes.
  • Both high or both low loss contradicts the protective function.
  • Level-independent loss fails to protect during transmit.


Common Pitfalls:

Assuming all duplexers are purely passive hybrids; TR limiters provide the level-dependent isolation crucial for radar.


Final Answer:

Low loss for weak (low-level) echo signals and high loss for the strong transmit pulse

More Questions from Microwave Communication

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion