In solid-state magnetism, materials that lack permanent magnetic dipoles (and develop only weak, negative magnetization in an applied field) are classified as which type?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Diamagnetic

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Magnetic behavior of materials arises from electron spins and orbital motions. Whether a solid exhibits a net permanent moment depends on the presence of unpaired spins and cooperative ordering. This question checks the basic classification when no permanent dipoles exist in the absence of a field.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • No permanent magnetic dipoles; all atomic or molecular moments cancel out in zero field.
  • Consider response in a weak, applied magnetic field.
  • Temperature is not driving long-range magnetic order (no ferromagnetic or ferrimagnetic states).


Concept / Approach:
Diamagnetic materials have all electrons paired; they exhibit an induced magnetic moment opposite to the external field due to Lenz-like response of orbital motion, giving a small negative susceptibility. Paramagnets have unpaired electrons that align weakly with the field (positive susceptibility) but no permanent magnetization without a field. Ferromagnets and ferrimagnets show spontaneous ordering and domain behavior leading to permanent dipoles.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify the absence of permanent dipoles → rules out ferro-, ferri-, and antiferromagnets in their ordered states.Paramagnets still possess permanent atomic moments (unpaired spins) even if disordered → not suitable.Materials with paired electrons only exhibit diamagnetism with negative susceptibility.


Verification / Alternative check:

Examples: bismuth, copper, and superconductors (perfect diamagnetism in the Meissner state) demonstrate diamagnetic behavior.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Paramagnetic: contains permanent dipoles from unpaired spins.Ferromagnetic/Ferrimagnetic: possess domain magnetization and remanence.Antiferromagnetic (not listed in stem but as an option): still has ordered sublattice spins, although net moment may cancel; not “no permanent dipoles.”


Common Pitfalls:

Equating “no net moment” with “no dipoles”; antiferromagnets have opposing sublattice dipoles, not the absence of dipoles.


Final Answer:

Diamagnetic

More Questions from Materials and Components

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion