Deuteromycota (Fungi Imperfecti) are defined operationally by the absence of a known sexual stage. Which feature would therefore NOT be expected in a typical Deuteromycota organism?

Introduction / Context:
“Deuteromycota” historically grouped fungi lacking an observed sexual state (anamorph only). Although modern taxonomy places these forms within Ascomycota or Basidiomycota when teleomorphs are known, the classic exam concept remains: no sexual spores identified.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Characteristic: absence of sexual reproduction structures.
• They reproduce via asexual spores (conidia) and exhibit absorptive nutrition.
• They are true eukaryotes with nuclei.

Concept / Approach:
Because the sexual stage is unknown, Deuteromycota do not display ascospores, basidiospores, or zygospores. Discovery of a sexual stage typically reclassifies the organism into the appropriate division.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the defining absence: sexual spore formation. List sexual spore types (asco-, basidio-, zygo-). Select the option that includes these sexual spores as “not expected.” Confirm asexual spores and absorptive nutrition are present.

Verification / Alternative check:
Clinical genera like Aspergillus and Penicillium were historically placed here before teleomorph discovery.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Asexual spores/absorptive nutrition/nucleus: Expected features.
• Septate hyphae in many species: Common among these fungi.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming “imperfect” means structurally simple; many have complex asexual structures.

Final Answer:
ascospores, basidiospores or zygospores.