From the given statement, only Conclusion II follows
It is the obvious choice.
From the above two statements, it is not clear whether the parliament can assure the fundamental rights or not.
If all the students in a particular class are intelligent and Rashmi is not intelligent, then it means Rashmi is not the student of that particular class which does not have a signal students who is not intelligent.
From Statement I, it can be concluded that 'All participants in the race are students'. Since, it is given in Statement III that 'All girl participants in the race are invited for coaching'. So options (a) and (b) cannot be concluded. Hence, answer is option (c).
All artists are whimsical and some of the artists are drug addicts.
Thus, all those artists who are drug addicts are also whimsical. Hence, some drug addicts are whimsical.
Both the conclusions are not related to the statement Hence, neither I nor II follows.
Interest in reading cannot be inculcated by force. Hence, Conclusion I does snot follow. However, compulsory reading will
develop a gradual Inclination towards reading. Hence, Conclusion II follows.
There was desire in the past to influence the destiny but there were less option available that time, hence Conclusion I follows.
As given in the condition in the statement, the actor will either take the full payment for his recent show or will not take any money for the same. Hence, either of the conclusions follows.
Both the conclusions follow. Since the option is available from next year, it implies that this option was not available earlier. Secondly, students who are week in Mathematics and Science will be benefited.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.