Argument I is strong because the very poor among the upper castes really need reservation. Argument II is weak because it is not true.
This is the case of "unless X, Y" so in this case negation of one statement will be followed by other statement.
None of the given options relates logically to the given statements.
It is an example of either a or b type:
CD a ? - b that is logically incorrect.
BA a ? b that is also logically incorrect.
DB b ? a that is also logically correct
CA - a ? b that is also logically correct
It is the case of "Either X or Y" hence (~ X ? Y) and (~ Y ? X) hence option (C) is correct.
This belongs to Type 3:- "Unless X, Y and Z" This statement implies that:
(i) (~ X ? Y or Z)
(ii) (~ Y or/and ~ Z ? X) Given in option (B)
The conclusion should be if Manisha ate the orange, then Rajesh did not cook.
Same as above Ab and CD are logically correct.
It is the case of "Unless X , Y" the conclusion is:
Boss is not present means employees don't work. [ii and iv]
Employee work means boss is present. [iii and i]
Let X be the event that Geeta is present in the photo and event Y that her sister are present. Given that X ? Y.
As per the given information in the photo already has three people (Geeta's parents with their son 3 persons so remaining can be only 2 persons). Thus, Geeta cannot be in the photo.
This is the situation of "If X then Y and Z" it implies that:
(i) (X ? Y and Z)
(ii) (~ Y or/and ~ Z ? ~ X ) given in option (C)
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.