Statement: Should the sole evidence of a rape victim be supposed enough to prove the guilt? Arguments: I. Yes, rape is a heinous offence. II. No, the move will increase the chances of conviction of innocent persons.

if only argument I is strong
if only argument II is strong
if either I or II is strong
if neither I nor II is strong

Correct Answer: if only argument II is strong

Explanation:

I is not strong because it does not give sufficient reason. II is strong because it states a genuine concern.

← Previous Question Next Question→

More Questions from Statement and Argument

Statement: Should funds for social justice and empowerment be released to the NGOs by Central government if state machinery fails to make requisition to the ministry concerned of the Central government? Arguments: I. Yes, Various NGOs have a strong base among the people and experience of utilising funds issued by the Central government though the state government. II. No, the ministry will not be able to ascertain the works of the NGOs and will face practical problems.
Statement: Should the Centre consult the government of a state before deploying the army in its territory for the maintenance of law and order? Arguments: I. Yes, if the state government is taken into confidence, the purpose of deploying the army will be more meaningful. II. No, the Centre occupies position above the states and enjoys more power than the states.
Statement: Should India make it compulsory to sterilise every woman going for second delivery? Arguments: I. Yes, this is the only way to reduce the growth rate of population at faster pace. II. No, it will be a cruel act against nature.
Statement: Should the Indian Railways be corporatised? Arguments: I. Yes, the move will make it an autonomous entity, which will bring in enormous changes like quick decision-making . II. No, it is futile unless we put an end to the handling of archaic rules in the appointment of favourites to the top positions.
Statement: Should there be a law against superstition in India? Arguments: I. Yes, it is a belief in magical and similar influences, in idea or practice based on this. II. No, it has been recognised by our forefathers and has a strong base in our society.
Statement: Should there be death punishment for those who are involved in manufacturing spurious drugs? Arguments: I. Yes, mass murder for the sake of profit should be treated only by one law -death penalty. II. No, the main objective of the punishment is to bring reform in a convicted person by punishing him/her.
Statement: Should companies' donation to political parties be banned in India? Arguments: I. Yes, it was banned during 1969 and 1985 also. II. No, donation to political parties is not a new thing in the country and has been in existence right from 1956.
Statement: Should there be uniform civil code in India? Arguments: I. Yes, many personal laws relating to marriage, inheritance, guardianship, divorce, maintenance and property relations in all communities are unjust, especially unjust to women. II. No, India has a rich cultural mosaic and any artificial singularity, sought to be achieved through a common civil code, would only make the society more fragmented.
Statement: Should all Mig-21 fighters be banned owing to frequent accidents of this aircraft? Arguments: I. Yes, it has become flying coffin. II. No, almost all the accidents were due to human error.
Statement: Should MNCs be allowed to start 100% owned subsidiaries in India? Arguments: I. Yes, our neighbours have permitted. II. No, India 's entrepreneurial system needs protection.

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

Join Discussion