Analogy — Dearth : Surplus\nChoose the option that preserves the same clear antonym relationship.

Introduction / Context:
Analogies often test antonyms. “Dearth : Surplus” is a textbook opposite pair: dearth means scarcity or shortage, while surplus means excess or abundance. To match this, we need another pair in which the two words stand in a direct, widely accepted opposite relationship.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Dearth and surplus are opposites in quantity.
• The correct option must present clear, nonambiguous lexical opposites, not loose contraries or associations.
• Part-of-speech and semantic domains should align to avoid category errors.

Concept / Approach:
Filter options by strict antonymy. Reject pairs where the relation is cause–effect, degree, synonymy, or metaphor. Prefer crisp dictionary-level opposites comparable to dearth vs surplus.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
“Simple” and “complicated” are presented in learner dictionaries as antonyms across domains (problems, explanations, designs), paralleling dearth vs surplus as clean contraries.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• True : Unbelievable — category and logic mismatch; false is the direct antonym of true.
• Touch : Repulsion — not antonyms; mixing action and disposition.
• Dream : Fantasy — both denote imagined states; they align semantically rather than oppose.

Common Pitfalls:
Choosing contraries that are not strict opposites or mixing categories (noun vs verb) that muddy the analogy.

Final Answer:
Simple : Complicated