Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: three
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
General ledger (GL) systems classify journal entries to streamline controls, workflows, and reporting. While organizations may add sub-categories, systems design typically recognizes a concise set that dictates approval paths and posting logic. This question asks for that commonly referenced count from a systems viewpoint.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Systems frequently group entries as: (1) original/regular (day-to-day operational postings), (2) adjusting (accruals/deferrals, estimates, corrections), and (3) closing (period-end transfers to retained earnings). This triad aligns with controls for period cut-off, segregation of duties, and financial statement preparation.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Accounting systems and textbooks commonly feature original/adjusting/closing as core types; others (opening, reversing) are often treated as sub-types or specific timing mechanics rather than separate principal types.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
One: Overly simplistic; does not reflect period-end processing realities.
Four or six: Some organizations enumerate sub-types, but the common systems design view is a triad for core workflows.
None: Incorrect; a recognized categorization exists.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing detailed sub-types (e.g., reversing entries) with principal categories used for controls and reporting.
Final Answer:
three
Discussion & Comments