Force direction in conventional (up) milling In conventional milling, does the cutting force have a lifting tendency on the workpiece clamped to the table?

Introduction / Context:
Understanding force directions in milling helps in fixturing and surface finish control. Conventional (up) milling and climb (down) milling yield opposite tangential force directions at the cutter–work interface.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Horizontal slab or face milling with standard cutter rotation.
• Work is rigidly clamped on the table.
• No special anti-lift fixtures used.

Concept / Approach:
In conventional milling, the chip thickness starts at zero and increases to a maximum. The cutter motion relative to feed causes a vertical force component that tends to lift the work from the table. In climb milling, the opposite happens: the force tends to press the work down.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify milling mode: conventional (up) milling.Relate chip formation kinematics: minimum to maximum thickness across engagement.Resolve forces: tangential and radial components combine to create an upward tendency on the work.

Verification / Alternative check:
Fixture design texts caution that up-milling requires secure clamping to resist lift; climb milling improves seating but demands backlash-free drives.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“False” contradicts standard mechanics of up-milling. The effect is not limited to low feeds, special cutters, or climb milling.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing the two milling modes; ignoring backlash constraints that often preclude climb milling on older machines.

Final Answer:
True